Talk:NIFTY 50

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2024/June;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article was nominated for deletion on February 7, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NIFTY 50 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

India High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

What should be considered a major fall/gain?

While 10% or so is considered a correction, if we are documenting single day crashes/rises and not over many months, I feel a threshold of 2.00% is good enough. Skratata69 (talk) 18:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold.

As seen on the list, a 2% dip or rebound happens all the time.

Plus, consider 14 Feb 2022, -3.06%, followed by 15 Feb 2022, +3.03%!

And 3 June 2024, -3.25%, then 4 June 2024, +5.93%, then 5 June 2024, +3.36%!! Net effect zero. Blink and you miss it. It's just natural volatility, not a crash. Question if any of these events are notable.

Don't get me started on "Probable Reason"!

Finally, an up-to-date graph would be better than a long table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.71.60.61 (talk) 08:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Index changes

@Skratata69: Per MOS:COLLAPSE, Collapsed or auto-collapsing cells or sections may be used with tables if they simply repeat information covered in the main text (or are purely supplementary, e.g., several past years of statistics in collapsed tables for comparison with a table of uncollapsed current stats). The unwieldy list of index changes is purely supplementary to the Constituents section directly above it which includes a column for "Date added". There is absolutely no reason the table should begin from 2009, when a full list of changes from 1996 is available on the Nifty Indices website. Also, what "looks better" is subjective and beside the point here. Yuvaank (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure @Yuvaank, thanks for pointing it out. I will revert my changes. And will play around and try to make it look better. Skratata69 (talk) 06:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By does not look better, I mean this doesn't really look great when the entire section is for index changes. It would make more sense if it was not a separate section and was included in other paragraphs/section

And the article is not that long enough yet that collapsible sections are needed. Skratata69 (talk) 06:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]